Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 12:31:27 +0200: > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:36 AM, Daniel Shahaf <danie...@elego.de> wrote: > > #define svn_hash_sets(ht, key, val) \ > > apr_hash_set(ht, key, APR_HASH_KEY_STRING, val) > > > > I would keep the current code for that. I allows for the > compiler optimization and does not have the double > parameter evaluation problem that the getter had. >
<@danielsh> stefan2: oh, I missed your mail suggesting to keep _sets as is. <@stefan2> danielsh: well, it's done now <@stefan2> It's not super important > > > and strip all the dunder-builtins stuff. > > > > BTW, could you educate me about the term "dunder"? > It's certainly nothing to do with underwear. "D[ouble] under[score]". I borrowed the term from Python.
