On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Ben Reser <b...@reser.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Stefan Küng <tortoise...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > crash reports for 1.8.1 are coming in now. Top crash right now is this:
> > https://www.crash-server.com/Problem.aspx?ClientID=tsvn&ProblemID=31426
> >
> >> libsvn_tsvn.dll!svn_path_join_internal(const char *
> >> base=0xfffffffffcfcc6f7, const char * component=0x0000000000000000,
> >> apr_pool_t * pool=0x0000000003033880) Line 115 C
> >> libsvn_tsvn.dll!checkout_dir(dir_context_t * dir=0x0000000003017e78,
> >> apr_pool_t * scratch_pool=0x0000000002fce380) Line 403 C
> >> libsvn_tsvn.dll!delete_entry(const char * path=0x000007fedc1f7708, long
> >> revision=50429560, void * parent_baton=0x0000000003033880, apr_pool_t *
> >> pool=0x000007fedc1f7708) Line 1546 C
> >> libsvn_tsvn.dll!do_item_commit(void * * dir_baton=0x0000000003f5ebb8,
> void
> >> * parent_baton=0x0000000003033880, void *
> callback_baton=0x0000000003f5ec70,
> >> const char * path=0x0000000002fcc3a8, apr_pool_t *
> pool=0x0000000003039838)
> >> Line 1590 C
> >> libsvn_tsvn.dll!svn_delta_path_driver2(const svn_delta_editor_t *
> >> editor=0x000000000301f7e0, void * edit_baton=0x0000000002fce6a0, const
> >> apr_array_header_t * paths=0x0000000003031870, int sort_paths=50438336,
> >> svn_error_t * (void * *, void *, void *, const char *, apr_pool_t *) *
> >> callback_func=0x000007fede5ebbd0, void *
> callback_baton=0x0000000003f5ec70,
> >> apr_pool_t * pool=0x000000000301f768) Line 263 C
> >> libsvn_tsvn.dll!svn_client__do_commit(const char *
> >> base_url=0x0000000002fcc310, const apr_array_header_t *
> >> commit_items=0x000000000302f7e8, const svn_delta_editor_t *
> >> editor=0x0000000002fce6a0, void * edit_baton=0x0000000002fce380, const
> char
> >> * notify_path_prefix=0x0000000003017960, apr_hash_t * *
> >> sha1_checksums=0x0000000003f5eda8, svn_client_ctx_t *
> >> ctx=0x000000000301a0c0, apr_pool_t * result_pool=0x00000000030176f8,
> >> apr_pool_t * scratch_pool=0x000000000301f768) Line 1808 C
> >> libsvn_tsvn.dll!svn_client_commit6(const apr_array_header_t *
> >> targets=0x0000000003017770, svn_depth_t depth=34, int keep_locks=0, int
> >> keep_changelists=0, int commit_as_operations=1, int
> >> include_file_externals=0, int include_dir_externals=0, const
> >> apr_array_header_t * changelists=0x0000000003017770, const apr_hash_t *
> >> revprop_table=0x0000000000000000, svn_error_t * (const
> svn_commit_info_t *,
> >> void *, apr_pool_t *) * commit_callback=0x000000013f3cc770, void *
> >> commit_baton=0x0000000000158de0, svn_client_ctx_t *
> ctx=0x000000000301a0c0,
> >> apr_pool_t * pool=0x00000000030176f8) Line 965 C
> >
> >
> > the dir->parent_dir->working_url in libsvn_ra_serf/commit.c, line 402 is
> > NULL which makes svn_path_join_internal access the null pointer.
>
> There clearly is a bug where dir->parent_dir->working_url is NULL,
> however the backtrace above seems to be showing that the component
> variable passed into svn_path_join_internal is NULL. checkout_dir()
> calls svn_path_url_add_component2() which uses uri_escape() on the
> component portion before calling svn_path_join_internal() with the
> result of uri_escape(). So I'm really not sure how the component is
> ending up NULL, but it appears to be a different issue from what you
> describe.
>
There's a small confusion about what the 'component' is I guess:
/* Implicitly checkout this dir now. */
dir->working_url = svn_path_url_add_component2(
dir->parent_dir->working_url,
dir->name, dir->pool);
It's actually dir->name that's NULL here, because:
const char *
svn_path_url_add_component2(const char *url,
const char *component,
apr_pool_t *pool)
{
/* = svn_path_uri_encode() but without always copying */
component = uri_escape(component, svn_uri__char_validity, pool);
return svn_path_join_internal(url, component, pool);
}
which means 'component' (the second param to svn_path_join_internal)
is also the second param in svn_path_url_add_component2.
But looking at the code of svn_path_url_add_component2():
component = uri_escape(component, svn_uri__char_validity, pool);
how is that possible without the compiler complaining? 'component' is
const, so how is it possible to assign the return value of
uri_escape() to it?
Could it be that this strange use of the component param made the
compiler do something wrong and that's why I get this crash?
Stefan
--
___
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
