On 15.08.2013 17:01, Julian Foad wrote: > Is this acceptable? Looks OK, from a quick review.
> This means that combining the two separately > committed changes "copy" and "move a child" into a single commit will > result in semantic data loss, which we are trying to avoid. Not really. The copied+moved child node will still have copyfrom information linking it to the source of the copy. That doesn't trivially tell us how the node came to be at the new location, but there are other cases where that's not tracked (e.g., sequential local renames followed by a commit; only the result will be tracked, not the intermediate (wc-local) states). -- Brane -- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco // Non-Stop Data e. br...@wandisco.com
