On 11/07/13 01:47, Ben Reser wrote:
> First of all this really belongs on the users@ list and not dev@. But it's
> here now so let's look at what your issues are...

It would belong to users@ is there was already an --enable-follow-symlinks option. But there isn't one.
So it belongs to dev@.

But I have waited for someone like you. Funny thing i find /you/ in dev@. But every single mailing list has someone like you. Let us watch you go, shall we? :D

What you do: You ask me /several/ times what I wan't to do. You even claim that I failed to explain my problem. (Surely that doesn't stop you from hi-jacking this thread with a self-loving and off-topic rant about you using the commandline).

Answer:
Look at the subject of this thread. It says "follow symlinks", also, I wrote multiple times that i want to follow symbolic links. With subversion. I want to follow symbolic links with subversion. I want subversion to follow symbolic links. I don't want it to behave differently so you can't use it to backup your home directory anymore. No. I am just asking for a (optional) option at compile (or run-) time. So that subversion offers a /choice/ to me. So I can follow symbolic links with it. Follow symbolic links. Follow symlinks. Symlinks. Follow them. Please. Thank you.

Good enough for you? Do you understand what I am talking about /now/? Or were you just trying to chill this thread with a pointless response?

Now, instead of reading my posts, you might want to ask what I want to achieve with that.

The answer is the same: I wan't to follow symbolic links so I have /meaningful/ files in my repository. Subversion allowes crazy people to store special files in a repository but it offers no option to follow symbolic links. It even defends mount --bind.

The biggest part of your answer is completely off-topic. You demonstrate the /is/ situation, or whatever, which is completely
pointless since subversion doesn't follow symbolic links.

> I'm not sure there are any commands that need --enable-follow-symlinks.

Well why do you bother to answer/write at all? You successfully wasted my time.


Thanks,
Dirk



Reply via email to