Daniel Shahaf <[email protected]> writes: > Philip Martin wrote on Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 16:52:38 +0000: >> [ pointed out several problems ] > > I agree. > > It's still not clear to me how the repository you posted managed to get > rep-cache.db to refer to the file rep at offset 0 --- a rep which isn't > reachable from the root-node-offset at the end of the file. In your > simulation of the failure, did commit_baton get re-initialized between > the failed and successful commit_body() calls? I think in a normal > situation it would be.
The failed commit and the successful commit were made by two separate processes. The rep_cache offest points to the text representation at the start of the file, not to either file node representation. -- Philip Martin | Subversion Committer WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
