On 24.01.2014 18:20, Ben Reser wrote: > 2) libsvn_client_mtcc_*: Should these exist at all or be moved to another > library? This conversation died out.
I asked for this API to be marked experimental, and was ignored. I'm not at all happy about that. I'm going to take this opportunity to say -1 to having this in libsvn_client. It's a layering violation. Instead, I propose we introduce a new API module and library, svn_tools, that contains all the various APIfied functionality from our command-line utilities (apart from the svn client itself, of course). The MTCC API should be moved to svn_tools. If we have APIs for svnversion, svnadmin, etc., that are not already covered by the existing librararies, we should move them, too. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco // Non-Stop Data e. br...@wandisco.com
