On 31 January 2014 05:50, Evgeny Kotkov <evgeny.kot...@visualsvn.com> wrote:
>> This only affects non-sharded repositories with rev-local IDs,
>> i.e. those in SVN 1.4 format. For those, it is writing 3 files
>> instead of 2 per rev now.
>
> I assume you are talking about r1560723 [1].  If I read the code correctly...
> [[[
>       if (   (!max_files_per_dir || rev % max_files_per_dir == 0)
>           && dst_ffd->format >= SVN_FS_FS__MIN_NO_GLOBAL_IDS_FORMAT)
>         SVN_ERR(hotcopy_update_current(&dst_youngest, dst_fs, rev, iterpool));
> ]]]
>
> ...hotcopy now checkpoints after every revision for all non-sharded 
> repositories
> with FSFS format >= 3.  So, checkpointing happens for all FSFS format 1/2
> repositories upgraded via 'svnadmin upgrade' (with linear layout), that were
> not fsfs-reshard'ed or dump/loaded into a repository with newer format.
>
> I am not aware of how many people reshard or dump/load their old repositories
> after upgrade, but I did a quick benchmark for a real-world repository and on 
> my
> machine it shows 7x performance degradation with checkpointing enabled.  Is it
> worth the ability to re-run the backup from a checkpoint upon cancellation?
>
> [[[
>   # svnrdump http://googletest.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/
>   # load the dump into a --compatible-version=1.3 repository
>   # upgrade the repository with the most recent svnadmin
>
>   # disable checkpointing, benchmark making 100 hotcopy backups:
>   real 0m18.741s
>   user 0m2.552s
>   sys 0m13.432s
>
>   # now enable checkpointing and repeat the benchmark:
>   real 2m5.793s
>   user 0m0.836s
>   sys 0m34.840s
> ]]]
>
> [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1560723
>
That's what I suspected. In this case I think r1560723 should not be
backported to 1.8.x for the following reasons:
1. Significant performance degradation for 'svnadmin hotcopy' with
'--incremental' flag.
2. The change doesn't fix original circular dependency problem in FSFS
3. 'svnadmin recover' writes fake value to CURRENT file which very bad
practice IMHO and could lead undefined consequences.


-- 
Ivan Zhakov
CTO | VisualSVN | http://www.visualsvn.com

Reply via email to