A couple of clarifications. Julian Foad wrote: > And note that the doc string for svn_ra_get_file_revs2() explicitly says > these > false positives can be returned.
In fact it's not explicit, but it directs the reader to see svn_fs_history_prev() for a definition of "interesting revisions", and that function's doc string has a note that it doesn't guarantee there's any change of content. > -- (perhaps) a definite content comparison API: "has the content changed?" I mean "is the content different?", in case that's clearer. - Julian
