Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> writes: > However, the 'main' function is explicitly defined to have exactly two > forms: > > int main(void); // or int main(); in C++ > > and > > int main(int argc, char *argv[]); > > The distinction is unimportant as far as the purpose of he configure > test is concerned; but a pedantic compiler may warn, or even refuse to > accept, the form you use in the test.
I have no problem with your change but I don't believe a compiler would reject 'int main()'. The standard explicitly allows declarations "equivalent" to the two declarations you give and I believe 'int main()' qualifies, particularly since some of the examples in the standard use 'int main()'. -- Philip Martin | Subversion Committer WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data*
