On 02.04.2014 20:24, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 02.04.2014 18:26, Ben Reser wrote: >> On 4/2/14, 4:08 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: >>> So given these reasons I'm -1 on proposed release policy change. >> Can you clarify if you mean this as a veto or just a vote against. I'm a tad >> fuzzy if vetos apply to policy changes (maybe someone can step in here and >> remind me what applies here). > > It's not and cannot be a veto. A veto can only be raised for specific > code changes on technical grounds. > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
That said, on this project, we've always strived to find consensus instead of letting the majority dictate. Every -1, even when not a veto, is a concern to be addressed. Which we are doing by way of discussing the reasons in these two threads. That the reasons appear inconsistent, if not downright arbitrary, is a different matter. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco // Non-Stop Data e. br...@wandisco.com
