Branko Čibej wrote: > On 19.05.2014 13:30, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> Because I assumed it would error, realized it didn't, and digging into >> the history revealed that it was probably an unintentional omission. [...] >> I hadn't checked 'svn propget versioned_prop'. It makes sense to me that it >> should error out on non-existing properties. Would that be a reasonable >> course >> to take? Or does anyone prefer to retain the pre-r1592724 behaviour? > > Didn't we spend time making sure that recursive operations do /not/ > error out in such cases?
That sounds possible. Another thought: what is the impact on the XML output mode? That's a more important API, and I haven't reviewed the impact at all. - Julian
