On 26.06.2014 17:45, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 05:08:38PM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: >> I'd be fine with switching to option 2 as long as everyone understands >> the implications. > How about we write option 3 code to generate option 1 code, then hardcode > the generated option 1 code but put the option 3 code in a comment near > the option 1 code as a reference?
I don't see how requiring people to review the generator /and/ the generated constant, independently of each other, and prove that the former produces the latter, will make the code more maintainable and understandable. -- Brane -- Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion WANdisco // Non-Stop Data e. br...@wandisco.com
