On 7/4/14 2:23 PM, Mark Eichin wrote: > Ah, does that imply that it's far enough along that it doesn't need a ticket? > (or does it cause http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1199 to > be reopened, since that was, I assume, what introduced it?)
No need for a ticket and Issue #1199 is not where we caused that regression. It was caused by the fix for Issue #4332. Details here for the curious: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4332 > (I am still surprised that it isn't > in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/CHANGES but I guess it is > minor relative to many of the things there.) CHANGES on trunk is not always up to date, it gets updated sporadically. You can only really rely on CHANGES to be accurate in released code. As it is trunk's CHANGES file is probably unusually up to date right now because we've put out a 1.9.0-alpha release.
