On 09/22/2014 12:13 PM, Julian Foad wrote: > Yup. So let's say we can agree to hide this behaviour at the repos layer. > Then we face the decision of what to do with the FS layer: > > * make FS layer consistently version no-ops > -- a lot of work at FS layer > -- some work at repos layer > > * make FS layer consistently not version no-ops > -- some work at FS layer > -- no work at repos layer > > * leave FS layer as it is, partially implemented > -- no work at FS layer > -- some work at repos layer > > Which approach would you favour, and why?
"make FS layer consistently not version no-ops" stands in opposition to the historical intent for the FS layer. The other two options are fine with me, though I confess that at this stage of the game, trying to retroactively consistify the FS layer's behavior without a driving use-case beyond mere developer OCD seems like a waste of time of energy. That said, it's neither my time nor energy at risk, so weigh my input accordingly. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
