On 24.11.2014 14:28, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On 21 November 2014 at 19:34, Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> wrote: >> On 21.11.2014 17:07, Ivan Zhakov wrote: >>> On 21 November 2014 17:15, Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> wrote: >>>> On 21.11.2014 14:41, i...@apache.org wrote: >>>> Why do you want to be able to turn off log addressing, when you can just >>>> not use FSFSv7 in the first place? >>>> >>> This is just a small addition to existing API like >>> SVN_FS_CONFIG_FSFS_SHARD_SIZE, SVN_FS_CONFIG_FSFS_BLOCK_READ, >>> SVN_FS_CONFIG_BDB_TXN_NOSYNC etc. It doesn't change user-visible >>> behavior and I'm planning to use this in the test suite. >>> >>> If you have any concerns regarding this change, please let me know. >> The parameters you mention are all performance-related knobs, so not >> quite comparable to the change you made. Perhaps a better comparison is >> the FS layout option (sharded vs. non-sharded, packed vs. unpacked). >> > That's not quite true. This API option is similar to the following: > 1) create a FSFSv6 repository > 2) upgrade it to the FSFSv7 format.
I was under the impression that, since r1637184, upgrading from v6 to v7 without a dump/load cycle is no longer realistic for non-trivial (i.e., non-empty) repositories? -- Brane
