On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:23:10PM +0000, Philip Martin wrote: > Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> writes: > > > I think this extra walk is pointless most of the time and is just making > > our nominally O(1) copy operation slower. Locks on the copy source do > > not prevent a copy. > > Oops! I meant to write "Locks on the copy source held by somebody else > do not prevent a copy". > > -- > Philip
Thanks for digging up the history. I was wondering too whether this walk is really needed but ended up assuming it had always been there. Should we raise an issue with mod_dav developers? (gstein?)
