Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com> writes: > I could change the proposal > but I don't know if the backport script would then interpret Daniel's > vote for the other revisions as approving the whole backport:
I don't think the backport script would do that but changing the proposal looks like the wrong thing: the 'missing' revisions are proposed for merge to 1.8.x just not from trunk. I suppose we could change the backport script to also look for 'missing' revisions in the commits made to the proposed branch. -- Philip
