Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 21:03:04 +0100: > On 27.02.2015 18:20, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > The > > intended users are scripts so a longer spelling is not a problem there, > > either. > > I don't oppose the change. We can have both spellings, too.
Okay. I've gone ahead and changed the spelling from last-changed-rev to last-changed-revision: r1663003. I wouldn't be opposed to supporting both spellings, but since a reason to support multiple spellings for a single function has not been identified, I defaulted to unambiguity. Cheers, Daniel
