On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> stef...@apache.org wrote on Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 13:16:22 -0000: > > Author: stefan2 > > Date: Sat Mar 28 13:16:21 2015 > > New Revision: 1669769 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1669769 > > Log: > > * STATUS: Add 1.9 API doccu & declaration fixes r1668598 through > r1668608. > > > > Modified: > > subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS > > > > Modified: subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS > > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS?rev=1669769&r1=1669768&r2=1669769&view=diff > > > ============================================================================== > > --- subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS (original) > > +++ subversion/branches/1.9.x/STATUS Sat Mar 28 13:16:21 2015 > > @@ -231,6 +231,54 @@ Other candidate changes: > > Votes: > > +1: stefan2 > > > > + * r1668598 > > + Fixes to the public svn_config API declarations and documentation. > > + Justification: > > + Have a complete, correct and easily accessible API description. > > + None of these changes should affect generated code nor the ABI. > > + Votes: > > + +1: stefan2 > > Voting is not required for documentation fixes, according to > < > https://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html#release-stabilization > >. > > I think you can just move the doxygen fixes to the approved section. > They're practically obvious fixes. > Good point. That reduces noise for reviewers. I moved the docstring-only patches to "approved" now. -- Stefan^2.
