Evgeny, part of the problem is this: Evgeny Kotkov <evgeny.kot...@visualsvn.com> wrote: > Bert Huijben <b...@qqmail.nl> writes: >> I'm just -0.9 on reverting the rest 'as it *may* have problems too'. > > Perhaps I was not clear on my motivation, so here is how I see it. > > We had state A, and it has been well-defined during many consecutive releases.
If the state has been "well defined", then please point us to the definition of it, or to the tests that confirm it works as defined. If you can't, then the state has not been "well defined". All we can say is it has been "unchanged" over a long period of time. Just making this point before reading further. - Julian
