Hi,

following patch adds the troubleshooting section to the 1.9 release notes including a section about lock/unlock issues related to old/ancient proxies.

I'd appreciate, if the actual description could be reviewed by someone with a deeper knowledge on the underlying issue than I have.

[[[
Add a troubleshooting section to 1.9 to help users tracing down problems related to proxies when locking/unlocking multiple files.

* docs/release-notes/1.9.html
  (troubleshooting): Add new section including http-pipelining issue
                     description.
]]]

Regards,
Stefan

Index: 1.9.html
===================================================================
--- 1.9.html	(revision 1743861)
+++ 1.9.html	(working copy)
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
       >Many enhancements and bug fixes</a></li>
   <li><a href="#issues"
       >Known issues in the release</a></li>
+  <li><a href="#troubleshooting"
+      >Troubleshooting issues specific to this release</a></li>
 </ul>
 
 <p>Apache Subversion 1.9 is a superset of all previous Subversion
@@ -1451,6 +1453,50 @@
 
 </div>  <!-- issues -->
 
+<div class="h2" id="troubleshooting">
+<h2>Troubleshooting issues specific to this release
+  <a class="sectionlink" href="#troubleshooting"
+    title="Link to this section">&para;</a>
+</h2>
+
+<p>Subversion 1.9 introduces new features and makes use of new techniques
+which can trigger problems not encountered in previous versions. In contrast to
+known issues, things listed here are not due to some bug or issue in Subversion
+itself and therefore cannot be fixed with a new patch release.
+This section lists all known problems and provides instructions to solve them,
+if they occur.</p>
+
+<div class="h3" id="http-pipeline-issue">
+<h3>Lock/Unlock errors related to http-pipelining
+  <a class="sectionlink" href="#http-pipeline-issue"
+    title="Link to this section">&para;</a>
+</h3>
+
+<p>Subversion 1.9.0 introduces the use of http-pipelining for locking/unlocking
+multiple files. While SVN detects whether http-pipelining is supported (and
+falls back to non-http-pipelining mode, if it isn't), issues can arrise, if
+there are flaws or bugs with any of the protocols/applications involved in
+processing http-pipelining.<br />
+Especially, if there are older proxies present in the network topology, it's
+possible that you run into issues, since being a technology which was
+introduced in HTTP/1.1 (and the full performance benefit is not expected unless
+you are using HTTP/2), this feature might have not been extensively tested by
+your proxy vendor.<br />
+To troubleshoot whether the proxy is causing an issue, try to lock/unlock
+multiple files bypassing the proxy. If that works, please get in touch with
+the proxy vendor to notify him about the problem and ask for support.
+It's also appreciated, if you would let the SVN developers know about the
+effected proxy via the users mailing list so this troubleshooting section can
+be updated.<br />
+At the moment there is one potentially known proprietary proxy running into
+this issue: Java-SSL-tunnel. See
+<a href="http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=4061&dsMessageId=3171337";>Tortoise SVN mailing list</a>
+.</p>
+
+</div>  <!-- http-pipeline-issue -->
+
+</div>  <!-- troubleshooting -->
+
 <div class="h2" id="svn-1.7-deprecation">
 <h2>Subversion 1.7.x series no longer supported
   <a class="sectionlink" href="#svn-1.7-deprecation"

Reply via email to