Stefan Sperling wrote on Mon, 24 Jul 2017 18:34 +0200: > Daniel, I'm thinking that reverting r1802797, which changed the default > behaviour of 'svn cleanup', may be good enough to address your backwards > compat concerns, while still giving people a choice to remove pristines > without risking a disturbance of other active clients.
I'm not sure I understand. Are you saying that the default won't change, but there will be a new API that allows vacuuming pristines without breaking locks? +1 to that. (If I misunderstood let's try to clarify on IRC for higher bandwidth there)
