On 27.11.2017 14:52, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > I know this has been discussed before, but it was never made reality. > On last week's hackathon we also didn't come to a full consensus on > various details. But I think we should simply work out those details, > hopefully come to some compromise, and if so, JFD it.
It has been discussed before and for a while we even did it this way. The problem is that we're again at the point where we have to find a reluctant volunteer to RM any release we want to make. So ... "There's no 'we' in Team" :p Some individual has to step up and do this. The sort of release train you describe needs someone to drive it, to whit, a "permanent" release manager. No amount of documentation and schedules and good intentions will make this happen all by itself. -- Brane
