On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 1, 2017, at 5:38 AM, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> On 01.12.2017 13:16, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >>> Great! I gather from the reactions in this thread that we have >>> consensus on the principle, we "just" need to do it :-). And figure >>> out some details. >> >> Will that be Subversion 18.04 Anticlimactic Albatross? > > Please, please, DON'T do names like that!!!
Hehe, no :-). In fact, we haven't really talked about version numbers / names in this thread, and I'd like to keep it that way. I think this is orthogonal to "should we go for time-based releases?". I suggest if someone wants to discuss our versioning scheme, he/she should start a new thread. Otherwise, I think we should just stick with our current versioning scheme for now [1]. [1] http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/releasing.html#release-numbering -- Johan
