Philip Martin wrote:
Julian Foad <> writes:
Philip Martin wrote:
First I ran the 1.9 testsuite against 1.10 servers
over http:// and svn://.  [...]

Philip, please can you tell me how you did this?

I also ran the 1.10 testsuite against 1.9 servers over http:// and
svn://.  In order to run the svn:// tests I had to disable part of
ra-test 10 as the 1.9 server doesn't have r1723865 and the 1.10
testsuite would block.

Perhaps I answered the wrong question.  If you are asking how I disabled
part of ra-test then I simply removed the code and recompiled.  Looking
at it again I'm not sure why I referred to test 10 as the problem code
is in get_dir_test()

I meant how you tested 1.9 against 1.10 and 1.10 against 1.9 in general. Thanks for your first reply about that. This additional info is also useful.

- Julian

Index: ../src-1.10/subversion/tests/libsvn_ra/ra-test.c
--- ../src-1.10/subversion/tests/libsvn_ra/ra-test.c    (revision 1823419)
+++ ../src-1.10/subversion/tests/libsvn_ra/ra-test.c    (working copy)
@@ -604,6 +604,7 @@ get_dir_test(const svn_test_opts_t *opts,
                                          SVN_DIRENT_KIND, pool),
+#if 0
    /* Test fetching SVN_DIRENT_SIZE without SVN_DIRENT_KIND. */
    SVN_ERR(svn_ra_get_dir2(session, &dirents, NULL, NULL, "", 1,
                            SVN_DIRENT_SIZE, pool));
@@ -611,7 +612,6 @@ get_dir_test(const svn_test_opts_t *opts,
    ent = svn_hash_gets(dirents, "A");
-#if 0
    /* ra_serf has returns SVN_INVALID_SIZE instead of documented zero for
     * for directories. */
    SVN_TEST_INT_ASSERT(ent->size, 0);

Reply via email to