Can anyone comment on this please? On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:29 PM Stefan Kueng <tortoise...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > It seems that svn doesn't handle reparse points properly in all > situations. Which causes big problems for TSVN when a working copy is on > a Onedrive folder. > > See here for more details: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/tortoisesvn/hlQj5OifhBg/RX_cw_sQCgAJ > > While in this particular situation, other svn clients are not affected, > it still means that there's a problem. > > I've attached a patch for handling reparse points better when detecting > and reading the working copy database. With this change, the TSVN > context menu shows up properly. > > But while I was trying to figure out this particular problem I noticed > that svn_io_check_path() never tries to resolve the reparse points. Why > is that? I mean if we need to check for links/reparse-points there's > svn_io_check_special_path(). Also, svn_io_check_path() always returns > node_file for reparse points, even if they point to directories. > IMHO handling links/reparse-points specially is only required in very > specific situations, like adding them. In most cases, resolving the > links/reparse points is what should be done. Or am I missing something > big here? > > Stefan > -- ___ oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile" (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
