Julian Foad wrote: > [...] Are we saying now > that they need not be specifically marked if we feel they are pretty > safe? If we say that, then marking specific APIs as "experimental" in a > regular release signifies only that we consider them more experimental > (less stable) than others. > > That might be fine. Anyone developing against a regular release is > necessarily developing against new (experimental) APIs, so maybe no > explicit warning mechanism is necessary.
I have gone ahead with producing a release candidate 1.11.0-rc1 with things just as they are. It currently seems OK to me. If we decide we need to change this, we can. -- - Julian
