On 12/13/18 10:45 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > Uh. I forgot about the malfunction handler. However this doesn't really > help, other than putting possibly sensitive paths into the crash handler > info? We really shouldn't do it this way, users *will* just copy and > paste the output tot he 'net.
Ahem. What Grandpa *meant* to say was: "Oh, cool! So there _is_ a way to report the non-canonical path. Thanks for figuring this out, Julian! Unfortunately, it comes at a cost, namely that of revealing potentially sensitive paths in the output which I strongly suspect will get copied and paste to the 'net. If we could mitigate that part of it, this might turn out to be truly beneficial." ;-)
