Branko Čibej wrote: > Julian Foad wrote: > > * When the facility to contribute in this way (PRs) is available, it is > > because We, the ASF community, have made it so, and we can turn it off if > > we don't like it. > > [...] we can request that Infra removes *our* GitHub > mirror, just as we requested in the past that it creates one.
Exactly: our project gets to say what goes for our project. > I'd rather > see the ability to submit pull requests disabled for that mirror, though. Me too. GH, as a closed system, intentionally limits what we can do with it. I'm pretty sure I asked in the past to turn off PRs and was told that's not possible. I'm pretty sure with GitLab we could turn off PRs. > > * I think the PR style of contribution is useful. > > I think it is not. This style seems to be designed specifically so that > contributors have to interact with the community as *little* as > possible. [...] That is certainly the effect we get from GitHub's PRs and the ASF non-integration, but it's not necessarily true of the PR concept in general. -- - Julian