Branko Čibej wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
> > * When the facility to contribute in this way (PRs) is available, it is 
> > because We, the ASF community, have made it so, and we can turn it off if 
> > we don't like it.
> 
> [...] we can request that Infra removes *our* GitHub
> mirror, just as we requested in the past that it creates one.

Exactly: our project gets to say what goes for our project.

> I'd rather
> see the ability to submit pull requests disabled for that mirror, though.

Me too. GH, as a closed system, intentionally limits what we can do with it. 
I'm pretty sure I asked in the past to turn off PRs and was told that's not 
possible. I'm pretty sure with GitLab we could turn off PRs.

> > * I think the PR style of contribution is useful.
> 
> I think it is not. This style seems to be designed specifically so that
> contributors have to interact with the community as *little* as
> possible. [...]

That is certainly the effect we get from GitHub's PRs and the ASF 
non-integration, but it's not necessarily true of the PR concept in general.

-- 
- Julian

Reply via email to