Nathan Hartman wrote:
Perhaps:
* 1 "byte size" code quality issue from the issue tracker
* 1 website task
* 1 Py3 support task
Generally, sure, sounds good. Go for it.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-1722 "svn
diff may missreport a revision as the working copy."
Errm... last reviewed 9 years ago. Is it really what it says it is?
Sadly, we have hundreds of unreviewed (or not recently reviewed) open
issues. Some are misleadingly labeled "bite-sized" but are really
symptoms of deeper problems. Can we take this opportunity to do
something about that? Like, maybe start bringing one old issue to the
dev list for review each week?
- Julian
