On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 12:37 AM Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> Nathan Hartman wrote on Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 00:08:48 -0400: > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 5:48 PM Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> > > wrote: > > > > > Good morning Nathan, > > > > > > > Good morning! Or whatever time it happens to be in your part of the world > > :-) > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UGT>, fifth sense. That makes sense. In fact, I wonder what would happen if the test were done in A/B/E. The > difference is that the working copy root does exist at r0, but A/B/E > doesn't. That should be an interesting test case. I'll try a few diffs with A/B/E/ manually with the cmdline client just to see what happens. But as Julian said, we're entering the territory of diminishing returns, so > it's up to you whether to continue ironing this one out or move on to other > issues. I agree. We're beating a dead horse here. I'll proceed to locate the next old issue that should be looked at...