On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 10:04 AM Julian Foad <[email protected]> wrote:
> Of course, there is a bigger picture. Nearly twenty years on, we're > still using our home-grown release management (and news feed, etc.) > infrastructure. In some sense it "does the job" but in other senses > surely we might benefit by using some release management (etc.) > infrastructure that's commonly used? If we got it right so that it was > not imposing a huge external system on us (gith... uh... ughb) but > instead was something that allowed us to adopt small bits of useful > infrastructure that remain under our control (especially our own domain > and branding)... > > Wishful thinking or are there any real possibilities? All good points. I'll do some research in the next few days. If anyone has some good ideas, please speak up! Nathan
