On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:06 AM Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If the following looks like a reasonable start, I'd like to go ahead > and commit it (and continue editing/fixing/improving)... r1869776: I committed most of the text discussed earlier to **staging**. More below: On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 6:59 AM Julian Foad <julianf...@apache.org> wrote: > A thought about supporting older Python versions... Somewhere in the > pipeline between community inputs and project outputs, should we > distinguish between "we will not support ..." and "we will be glad to > accept contributions that enable supporting ..."? How would this look? > > I am just getting the feeling that we, a small group of developers, are > trying to make a decision by ourselves when perhaps we should be more > actively reaching out to the wider community to invite them to influence > the result. I know we have to decide to write something, but maybe we > can write something that encourages the users (yes, the tiny proportion > that might do something about it) to feel they can have a stake in it if > they want to. To address this, I added the text I posted here earlier in a separate commit: r1869777 To see all of the above, visit: https://subversion-staging.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.14.html All thoughts, suggestions, and improvements are welcome. In particular there is a TODO item to figure out and describe which versions of Python 3.x we support in 1.14. Cheers, Nathan
