On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:45:32PM -0500, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 4:28 PM Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> > wrote: > > > Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 14:36:56 +0100: > > > [...] I will allow myself to merge any nominations which received at > > least > > > two +1 votes and no vetoes. > > > > HACKING [1] states: > > > > "For an LTS release line, a change is approved if it receives three +1s > > and no > > vetoes. (Only binding votes count; see above.)" > > > > If you want to change the policy, do so in a new thread with an appropriate > > subject line. > > > I read that as meaning that stsp will vote on items that need a third vote. > > Nathan
I literally meant that if there turned out to be lack of voting activity with important-looking fixes still in STATUS, I would just merge them with two +1s instead of three, applying the "silence implies consensus" principle. But I'll follow Daniel's opinion now and will simply leave any such fixes dangling.
