On 09 Mar 2021, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Thanks for the patch. dev@, anyone wants to review/apply this?
r1887464, and thanks for the poke, Daniel.
The original text was clearly a typo; I confirmed with some
grepping and code exploration. Thanks for the patch, Yutian.
Best regards, -Karl
Yutian Li wrote on Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 20:58:05 -0500:
[[[
Fix a comment in svn_fs_fs_private.h
* subversion/include/private/svn_fs_fs_private.h: Fix comment
]]]
Index: subversion/include/private/svn_fs_fs_private.h
===================================================================
--- subversion/include/private/svn_fs_fs_private.h (revision 1886964)
+++ subversion/include/private/svn_fs_fs_private.h (working copy)
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ typedef struct svn_fs_fs__id_part_t
svn_revnum_t revision;
/* sub-id value relative to REVISION. Its interpretation depends on
- the part itself. In rev_item, it is the index_index value, in others
+ the part itself. In rev_item, it is the item_index value, in others
it represents a unique counter value. */
apr_uint64_t number;
} svn_fs_fs__id_part_t;
