On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 2:03 PM Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > > Consensus can only result from an open discussion. That's a standard > ASF operating principle. > > The rhetoric in this thread effects chill on anyone who has an opinion > different from the opinion of certain speakers.
I must say I have not seen / felt any rhetoric. Only on-topic arguments pro and contra certain approaches. So I'm a bit lost here. I rebooted this thread last Monday after it lay low for a week or so. Not because I wanted to start an argument, but mainly to express my frustration over this issue *as an svn admin* (because I was investigating, in our company, the upgrade to a more recent svn client on a build server -- which I have since postponed, possibly forever, mainly because of this issue). I was happy to see so many people weighing in with their thoughts and suggestions. As far as I could see, this was a productive thread. > Therefore, this thread _cannot_ consense at this time. > > I think we should (US)table the matter for a few weeks and then (UK)table > it again. Np from my part, we can (US)table it for a while. For me, there is no urgency. We'll just not upgrade svn on our build machine for the time being (no rush). But of course, there are others (including the OP of this thread) who might be interested in a solution. Anyway, what's a couple of weeks in an svn release cycle ;-) ... -- Johan
