Julian Foad wrote on Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 07:03:43 +0000: > Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >This implies the wc won't be uniform revision. This might break user > >expectations; might [...], > I'm not sure how your clarification helps us progress. The point is: > > It might be *absolutely fine* for the real life users in their real life > situations, and that's what we need to find out.
So what are you saying? That we should stop doing design discussions and go talk to users? I agree we should talk to users, but I don't think we can pass the design buck to them and go "Those users +1ed this design so let's implement/release it". There might be better ideas we won't think of if we don't discuss things here on this list; the users that talk to us are unlikely to be representative of all our users anyway; and it's us, not them, who'll be promising to maintain that design going forward. Anyway, we can for starters call for testers on SVN-525 and on users@. Cheers, Daniel
