Den ons 30 mars 2022 kl 00:54 skrev Jun Omae <jun6...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 6:20 AM Daniel Sahlberg > <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Does anyone with experience in the bindings have time to look at the > backport of r1897441 (in 1.14.x/STATUS)? It was nominated by jun66j5, > however it doesn't apply cleanly. I think it would work if at least > r1885008 is added to the group, but probably also r1886858 and r1886872. > > > > It would be good to have it merged if it increases test coverage. > > > > Kind regards, > > Daniel > > Sorry, I noticed that the nomination r1897441 is not needed for 1.14.x. > Removed it from STATUS file. > > However, I get 2 failures from 1.14.x/win-tests.py on Windows > (tests for swig-py, swig-pl and javahl pass). > > FAIL: mod_authz_svn_tests.py 10: repos-relative access file > FAIL: mod_authz_svn_tests.py 11: repos-relative access file with bad > repository URL > > It seems to be necessary to merge r1884474 to fix. >
That one seems quite straight forward. Feel free to nominate! Kind regards, Daniel
