Nathan Hartman wrote on Sun, May 15, 2022 at 03:36:05 -0400: > On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 8:57 AM <danie...@apache.org> wrote: > > +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Sat May 14 12:57:32 2022 > > @@ -39,6 +39,15 @@ Candidate changes: > > votes: > > +1: rhuijben > > > > + * r1900882 > > + Replace a call to a function deprecated upstream. > > + Justification: > > + No-op on Python 3.2 and newer, but will allow Subversion 1.14.x to be > > + built by future Python 3.12. Note that Python 3.2 was released 9 > > years > > + before Subversion 1.14.0. > > + Votes: > > + +1: danielsh > > + > > Should futatuki's follow-up in r1900890 be added to this nomination?
Per <https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.14#python2>, breaking py2 support in a 1.14.x patch release is permitted. Thus, we are not required to add r1900890 to this nomination. If we do nominate r1900890, here's my +0 for it. (Not +1 because I haven't audited all callsites that «import gen_base».) > Also should this reference SVN-4899? r1900922.
