30 okt. 2022 kl. 16.55 skrev Daniel Sahlberg <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com>:
> On second thoughts (and after suggestion by hartmannathan on IRC [1]), I > think we should keep the file frozen in time but clearly indicate that it is > out of date and that the current version can be found elsewhere. I've > committed this as r1904935. Thank you, that is a fine solution.
