Karl Fogel wrote on Wed, 03 Jan 2024 22:13 +00:00: > On 01 Apr 2023, Evgeny Kotkov via dev wrote: >>Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> writes: >> >>> What's the question or action item to/for me? Thanks. >> >>I'm afraid I don't fully understand your question. As you >>probably remember, the change is blocked by your veto. To my >>knowledge, this veto hasn't been revoked as of now, and I simply >>mentioned that in my email. It is entirely your decision >>whether or not to take any action regarding this matter. > > So AIUI, Evgeny is asking you to withdraw your veto, Daniel. > Evgeny would like to merge this into trunk -- on the grounds, I > believe, that it is strictly an improvement over what we have now, > and it opens the door to further future improvements (each of > which would go through the usual discussion & consensus process, > of course). >
Acknowledging receipt. I'll reply substantively when I have the time to swap in the context. Daniel > Evgeny's work is on this branch... > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/pristine-checksum-salt > > ...which in turn branched from > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/pristine-checksum-kind. > > I used this command to get an overview of the work: > > $ svn cat > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/pristine-checksum-salt/BRANCH-README > > (The work is several months old now, but for the sake of > discussion let's assume it's mergeable, passes all tests, etc. > Obviously, Evgeny's only going to merge it when all of those > conditions are true -- maybe some minor tweaks will be needed to > get it there, I don't know.) > > Best regards, > -Karl
