On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 8:46 AM Daniel Sahlberg <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com> wrote: ... > Since the file doesn't have svn:needs-lock it should be RW [and the Reverted > message comes from Subversion trying to restore the W flag ...]
Should it? Intuitively I'd say: since the file doesn't have svn:needs-lock Subversion shouldn't be looking at R or RW. Why should we make a file RW? Can't the user make a file readonly just locally, and expect Subversion not to care? Or is "making a file readonly" a committable local change? Will it show up on 'svn st' and can it be committed as some change that can be transferred to another working copy? I understand that svn:needs-lock adds extra handling of the readonly status of files, but without that property? -- Johan
