Den mån 11 mars 2024 kl 00:59 skrev Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com >:
> Hi all, > > Unfortunately the recently released 1.14.3 contains a new regression > [1] that may crash the SWIG python bindings in repos.replay() under > some conditions. > > It is already fixed on trunk in r1915316 and backported to the 1.14.x > branch in r1915338. > > There was a discussion [2] about issuing a 1.14.4 release to fix it, > as there is no known workaround for Python users other than patching > some code or downgrading to 1.14.2. > > I volunteer to RM the 1.14.4 release. Of course, if anyone else would > like to RM, feel free to speak up. I'll be happy to assist. > > My tentative plan is to try to reproduce the issue and verify the fix, > and then proceed with the normal patch release process. > > There is at least a week before I can begin working on it, so there is > time for the dev community to respond. > > Meanwhile, there are two proposed backports in STATUS that might merit > some consideration: > * r1890223 et al "Support building on Win64/ARM64" > * r1914222 "Improve help message for svnmucc PUT" > > Each needs one additional vote to make it into the release. > > References: > > [1] 30 Jan 2024 mail to dev@ titled > "[patch] publication for the fix of swig-py bug fixed in r1915316" > archived at: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ds24b6w446horzvl4n8y6dqrfl3jb6s4 > > [2] 1 Feb 2024 mail to dev@ titled > "Re: svn commit: r1915317 - /subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS" > archived at: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/571hk0nykvrorx9wq0r0lyylpjj42qdw > > Thanks, > Nathan > That sounds great Nathan, thank you for following up on this! I'm travelling this week with limited amount of time but I will do my best to make room next week. Cheers, Daniel
