On Tue, Mar 3, 2026 at 2:55 PM Evgeny Kotkov <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Timofei Zhakov <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > I prepared a patch that fixes them by adding const where needed. Can
> anyone
> > correct me if I'm misunderstanding something?
>
> I think that the patch indeed improves the situation by propagating the
> non-
> const types upwards, so that everything happens without implicit const
> discards.  So +1 in general.
>
> One suggestion that I have is that it might be better to separate the
> simpler
> cases (like those in libsvn_fs/fs-loader.c:svn_fs__path_valid() and
> libsvn_fs_fs/tree.c:check_newline()) into their own patch or commit,
> keeping them distinct from the more complex cases.
>

+1, to separate those changes.

-- 
Timofei Zhakov

Reply via email to