On 6. 7. 2026 14:24, bert.qqmail.nl via dev wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From:[email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2026 2:23 PM
To:[email protected]
Subject: RE: svn commit: r1934506 - in subversion/branches/1.15.x: . 
subversion/include/private subversion/libsvn_subr


And then it was reverted (which I missed, before I pressed sent), but the merge 
info is still on the 1.15.x branch as of now, so re-merging doesn't work as 
expected.

        Bert


Ouch. I was sure I reverse-merged that commit. Do you have time to fix the mergeinfo? I'm short of minutes...


-- Brane


-----Original Message-----
From:[email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2026 7:23 PM
To:[email protected]
Subject: svn commit: r1934506 - in subversion/branches/1.15.x: . 
subversion/include/private subversion/libsvn_subr

Author: brane
Date: Fri May 22 17:22:56 2026
New Revision: 1934506

Log:
* branches/1.15.x/STATUS: +0 for r1934466 and the r1934437 group.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.15.x/   (props changed)
    subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS
    subversion/branches/1.15.x/subversion/include/private/svn_utf_private.h
    subversion/branches/1.15.x/subversion/libsvn_subr/sysinfo.c
    subversion/branches/1.15.x/subversion/libsvn_subr/utf.c
    subversion/branches/1.15.x/subversion/libsvn_subr/win32_xlate.c
    subversion/branches/1.15.x/subversion/libsvn_subr/win32_xlate.h

<snip>
This accidentally merged the utf-8 group you voted for.

        Bert


Reply via email to