On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 at 10:29, Daniel Sahlberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Den mån 27 juli 2026 kl 12:48 skrev <[email protected]>: > >> Author: ivan >> Date: Mon Jul 27 10:48:05 2026 >> New Revision: 1936631 >> > > ... > >> + /* Create 10 revisions. */ >> + for (i = 1; i < 10; ++i) >> + { >> + svn_fs_txn_t *txn; >> + svn_fs_root_t *txn_root; >> + svn_revnum_t new_rev = 0; >> + >> + svn_pool_clear(iterpool); >> + >> + SVN_ERR(svn_fs_begin_txn(&txn, fs, new_rev, iterpool)); >> + SVN_ERR(svn_fs_txn_root(&txn_root, txn, iterpool)); >> + SVN_ERR(svn_fs_make_dir(txn_root, apr_itoa(pool, i), iterpool)); >> > > Is it intentional to use pool instead of iterpool in the call to apr_itoa? > > No, it was not intentional. I copied this code from other test and didn't check it properly. Fixed in r1936661 <https://svn.apache.org/r1936661>. And I also fixed the code I copied from in r1936662 <https://svn.apache.org/r1936662>. Thanks! -- Ivan Zhakov
