On Thu, Nov 5, 2026 at 11:28 AM Daniel Sahlberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > tors 5 nov. 2026 kl. 17:23 skrev Nathan Hartman <[email protected]>: >> >> On Thu, Nov 5, 2026 at 11:19 AM hartmannathan.apache.org via commits >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Author: hartmannathan >> > Date: Thu Nov 5 16:19:26 2026 >> > New Revision: 1940084 >> > >> > Log: >> > * branches/1.15.x/STATUS: Upgrade my vote for r1936884 group (INSTALL >> > rewrite) >> > >> > Modified: >> > subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS >> > >> > Modified: subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS >> > ============================================================================== >> > --- subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS Thu Nov 5 15:52:04 2026 >> > (r1940083) >> > +++ subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS Thu Nov 5 16:19:26 2026 >> > (r1940084) >> > @@ -82,9 +82,8 @@ Other candidate changes: >> > Justification: >> > Documentation correctness >> > Votes: >> > - +1: hartmannathan (without 1937573-1937577, 1937693 and newer >> > revisions) >> > +1: dsahlberg (without 1937696 and newer revisions) >> > - +1: ivan >> > + +1: ivan, hartmannathan >> > >> > * r1937538 >> > Fix a memory corruption in utf.c:convert_to_stringbuf(). >> > >> >> With these changes, the length of "A Quick Guide" to installing >> Subversion is reduced from ~ 1600 lines to ~ 900, almost half! >> >> Looks like there is even more to remove (vcproj stuff)... so I guess >> we should wait to merge this huge list until those changes are >> nominated. :-) > > > vcproj is still a thing in 1.15 so that should remain! > > Feel free to approve this, I currently don’t have time to review the document > but I glanced over it when looking at 1.15 and it was nice improvement and > with you, Ivan and Pavel we have more then enough eyes. Add my +0 concept if > you want. > > /Daniel
Thanks for clearing that up. (I was confused from the recent vcproj-related work and discussion about renumbering the sections in INSTALL.) One question before I move it to Approved: I don't recall such a long list of revisions being merged through STATUS before. Will svn-role be able to handle it? Cheers, Nathan
