On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:33:22PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote: > [2009-09-13 23:34] Amit Uttamchandani <atu13...@csun.edu> > > > > Just curious as to the arguments against OO programming. All the classes > > I have taken in uni always trumpet OO. > > The problem of discussions with most people about OO is that they > simply have this different POV. They have their many-thousand SLOC > large code blocks in mind. >
I agree here. In uni and at work most have this POV. I don't I have met many who the UNIX POV in mind. > OO becomes senseless when your programs are small and simple. > > You have the separation in the operation system then. Single > independent programs take the place of classes. You can combine them > to larger programs. > Again I agree here but how is this accomplished? Through UNIX pipes? How do you transfer data between these programs? Do you use something like inter process communications? Sockets? > Then you have real reusability! > > > But most programmers don't reach this POV, hence they keep coding fat, > bloated software crap. > > > meillo Thanks.
