What is wrong with XHTML? Are you implying that HTML is superior? On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Anselm R Garbe <ans...@garbe.us> wrote: > 2009/10/18 Tor Aqissiaq <toraqiss...@googlemail.com>: >> XHTML, parsed using an XML parser is very specifically defined and >> does not look different in different browsers, but few people serve >> XHTML documents with the application/xhtml+xml headers, because IE >> refuses to parse XML. XHTML parsed as HTML + no better than HTML. I >> already use XHTML for sending documents to my friends. > > XHTML is a sick child that will die soon. > > Kind regards, > Anselm > >
- Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office s... Uriel
- Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office s... pancake
- Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office s... Antoni Grzymala
- Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite? (aka suckless word p... Anselm R Garbe
- Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite? (aka suckless w... Ilya Ilembitov
- Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite? (aka suckle... Anselm R Garbe
- Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite? (aka su... Tor Aqissiaq
- Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite? (ak... Szabolcs Nagy
- Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite... Tor Aqissiaq
- Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite? (ak... Anselm R Garbe
- Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite... Tor Aqissiaq
- Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office s... Anselm R Garbe
- Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office s... Tor Aqissiaq
- Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office s... Uriel
- Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office s... Uriel
- Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite... markus schnalke
- Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite... Uriel
- Re: [dev] (x)HTML-based office suite? (ak... Uriel