rtorrent's features are more than sufficient for most of us. It's not particularly "suckless", but it's ok for me. DHT is working, but I don't know about encryption and all that other fancy stuff... It can automatically add torrent files copied to some kind of listening-directory
On 5/4/10, Dieter Plaetinck <die...@plaetinck.be> wrote: > On Tue, 4 May 2010 16:09:22 +0600 > mikhail maluyk <mikhail.mal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Take a look at transmission. >> > > i think rtorrent is "ok". lightweight, but lacks some advanced > features such as webseeds. > > Personally i prefer support for DHT, webseeds, encryption and > whatnot. > > i just had a look at transmission, using it with its ncurses interface > seems to be pretty similar to rtorrent, except that it has > more features. > > furthermore it > * supports the xdg basedir spec (i hate things that pollute my ~) > * has a socket protocol > (http://trac.transmissionbt.com/browser/trunk/doc/rpc-spec.txt) > > but i wonder: > * does it have an event reporting/hooks system? so that i can execute > scripts/code when a torrent completed, stalled, is added, ... > * does it automatically update its own configuration? i hate it when > programs do that. > > Dieter > >
